From: Wieland Kleinert
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2026, 5:23 PM
To: Mailroom – Public Prosecutor’s Office Dresden – Saxony Justice <Poststelle@stadd.justiz.sachsen.de>
Subject: File Access 10***/18
Dear Ms. K***,
As you know, I have not been a resident of the EU since the beginning of November 2021 (the public prosecutor who signed the search warrant had, for whatever reason, hoped this would be the case).
At the same time, I have no income so far, only my accident pension of around €300. If I reach the age of 67, I will then receive a regular pension; early retirement was denied.
I have canceled all insurance policies, life insurance policies, and my Riester pension plan in order to be able to pay for my living expenses here.
Unfortunately, I have no other income so far.
My lawyer, Mr. S***, informed me by telephone that he had negotiated a “deal” with the public prosecutor that would only cost me about €150. He and the prosecutor knew I was innocent and had no income. That was the only reason I agreed. I had no idea that there was a fraudulent intent behind it.
Had I been informed about potential follow-up costs of the amount you mentioned, I would have preferred to take out a loan and prove my innocence in person.
Mr. S*** didn’t want that, however, and it would have been a very tight squeeze to book a flight.
All my evidence and letters to the public prosecutor’s office apparently never arrived. I noticed increased traffic from Dresden on an old website on the day and time of the hearing.
The public prosecutor’s office and my lawyer knew my whereabouts, yet official letters were sent to my old German address. Furthermore, I had listed Chen Jian Kai as a witness, including his address, but he was never contacted, even though he was willing to be.
Please send me a copy of the files. I cannot afford a lawyer and cannot travel to Germany.
The accusation against me is based solely on the false report from the man in Teltow. He twisted every statement, even statements made in front of witnesses (his colleagues…).
My rights were trampled upon, just as they were during the domestic attack in 2018 at 5:00 a.m., when, based on false statements, my wife’s house was destroyed and I was told I had no right to legal counsel.
During the search, which was conducted without witnesses, evidence was stolen and not recorded. This evidence was also photographed by the HSI (Historical Security Office). However, Teltow twisted everything, as already described.
The reason for the searches and accusations, however, did not support the charge of “guilt by order.” Therefore, all the cases listed in your letter are dismissed. The fee you requested was based on a completely different offense and legislation, which only came into effect a year later.
I was only given a penalty for something done by someone I neither knew nor had any business relationship with (Yang, the official arms buyer for the Taiwanese mafia, as stated in the American letter, who was arrested in the States because of missing parts for the weapons he purchased – something I wasn’t aware of beforehand).
I don’t know where this man is now; I think he’s an American citizen…
Chen Jian Kai, described as a “client,” has been to Europe about five times a year since then, with his wife and his boss.
Mr. Chen is just an interpreter. However, the company BingHe doesn’t belong to him, as stated in the report from Teltow.
It’s all publicly accessible and readable on the internet. You don’t need €12,000 for that; a simple Google search is enough.
And the laws are also available online, as is information on how to handle demonstration pieces (according to the stolen evidence, which documented all serial numbers and authorization) of so-called weapons in 2017. I had the paperwork on my desk the day before the robbery. I didn’t need the authorization because I hadn’t shipped anything. You know that Mr. Yang transported the parts himself.
No part arrived in Taiwan via the container I sent; all packages were x-rayed by the officials. Had one of the parts arrived, BingHe’s boss would probably be dead (death penalty).
Furthermore, the box of parts didn’t weigh 30 kg, as the gentlemen in Teltow stated, but less than 10 kg, so it was carry-on luggage to the USA… (?), perhaps he had even left it with a colleague in Chemnitz. – I have no idea; neither I, my former company, nor Chen ever exported it.
The items described first weren’t in Chen’s hand luggage either, but rather in BingHe’s customer’s…!!! (This is the second lie in the accusations made by the gentlemen from Teltow) – all of this can be found online via Google.
The “penalty order” and your “invoice” were knowingly sent to the wrong address.
The tax office, the city of Radeburg, my lawyer, and the public prosecutor’s office all knew my address and whereabouts, yet the invitation, the order, and the invoice were still sent to the wrong address.
AXA Insurance even has official proof of my whereabouts (due to money laundering charges).
Only the Dresden public prosecutor’s office, with a €12,000 invoice and orders based on a non-existent accusation, believes I live in a house without electricity, TV/radio license fees, or water… in a country where I’m no longer officially registered for tax purposes… What is the point of official deregistration? Isn’t the Dresden public prosecutor’s office an official body?
The raid on my house was carried out under the War Weapons Control Act because they wanted to prove they possessed 100 assault rifles and 70 pistols. The officers would have realized within seconds that this was utter nonsense. Furthermore, they cited legislation from September 2018 for the “crime” from 2017. Since this is no longer relevant, the raid has nothing to do with the penal order.
The indictment mentions a container that I supposedly loaded in Radebeul, which is also a complete lie. I never loaded a container in Radebeul!
Another lie is the public prosecutor’s claim that they don’t know Mr. Chen Jian Kai’s whereabouts, even though they equated his location with the address of YI-SIN TU. Moreover, I had already summoned him as a witness.
The indictment mentions a container that I supposedly loaded in Radebeul, which is also a total lie. Normally, BingHe could have exported the goods officially, with a customs declaration (which wouldn’t have been a problem under the pre-2018 legal situation – the seller was willing to ship them), but Mr. Yang objected because he had his own plans for them.
Since I didn’t export anything, I didn’t have to declare anything! That’s the fact!
The gentleman in Teltow believed that BingHe owed USD 80,000 upon receipt of the container, but I pointed out again that it was TWD, the currency in Taiwan, which is approximately €2,000.
After my explanation, I received a court summons for alleged electricity theft. Since I was able to prove otherwise to the court, the charges were dropped.
However, strangely, this was followed by a marathon of five in-depth tax audits, during which laws were rewritten to steal all the tax breaks I had received over the previous 10 years.
Why wasn’t I consulted by Dr. Why was Siefer taken to court? Why, as State Prosecutor Borries had hoped, did the investigation only begin once it was clear that I live with my family in Asia and cannot easily return to Germany?
Please send me the exact documentation for the requested sum of money.
Proof of the EVIDENCE that I allegedly exported these goods purchased in Schwerin from the EU for business purposes (I didn’t even buy them) – for example, parts found in the container for business purposes, export documents, import documents in Taiwan, that sort of thing. The tax office should also be informed so that the VAT paid by Yang can be refunded (approximately €18,000, if I’m not mistaken).
Please, nothing about “alleged weapons of war or functional parts thereof.” There was no mention of that in the “order” that led you to send the invoice to the wrong address.
So please, cancel the erroneous investigation into the misapplication of legislation and the entire operation without replacement!
The tax office should also be informed so that the VAT paid by Yang can be refunded (approximately €18,000, if I’m not mistaken). Presumably, the evidence can only be from 2022 and later, as no criminal offense was proven before then.
Please send it to my email address or via the Elster system, where I also gave permission for email transmission over three years ago.
Please also include a plan outlining how I can cover it from my pension payments.
I propose €50 per month. From summer 2031 onwards, you are welcome to deduct higher amounts for one year, based on the €1,000 pension promised by the Chancellor.
Please do not send any letters to my lawyer; I only receive €300 per hour on a monthly basis and have fixed expenses.
Please reply to this email before February 27, 2026, at 12:00 PM CET.
PS:
– Legally speaking, I never received any mail from you, as all letters were addressed to the wrong address (knowingly, i.e., intentionally).
– If the gentlemen who translated the emails from English to German had a better understanding of the language, all this effort could have been avoided.
– You can also contact the tax office and request your refund amount and ask them to transfer the remainder to the account you already have on file!
Sincerely,
Wieland Kleinert
Greetings from Macau